header-logo header-logo

13 August 2013
Issue: 7573 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

New referral fee rules

Conveyancers not subject to outright ban

Licensed conveyancers will not be subjected to an outright ban on referral fees, but must comply with new transparency conditions.

The Legal Services Board (LSB) last week granted an application by the Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC) to alter the rules on referral fees in conveyancing.

The CLC identified the biggest threat to consumers as the level of information given to them about referral fees, and the timing of that information, in a review and consultation exercise carried out earlier this year. It has now altered its Disclosure of Profits and Advantages Code. 

Conveyancers have three months to comply with the new arrangements, which provide that: agreements with third-party referrers should be in writing and subject to periodic review; clients should be informed in writing of the arrangement’s existence no later than when accepting instructions, or when introducing a client to another person; clients should be advised they have a choice of provider; and the client should be informed of the nature of the arrangement, including any payment made, with whom it is made, and any impact, including any legal costs they are charged.

Anna Bradley, CLC chair, said: “Our review of referral fees in conveyancing found no evidence of consumer detriment—an assessment shared by the LSB and Legal Services Consumer Panel following their own past research.” 

In 2011, The LSB published a report on referral fees in the conveyancing, personal injury and criminal advocacy markets. In April 2013, referral fees were banned for personal injury cases.

Issue: 7573 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll