header-logo header-logo

New residence test exemptions

04 March 2014
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has made new concessions to its proposed 12-month lawful residence test for access to civil legal aid.
 

In its response to the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) reportinto the access to justice implications of legal aid reforms, published this week, the MoJ introduced two new categories of exemption - successful asylum seekers and refugees who didn’t claim asylum in the UK but are resettled or transferred here. The latter category is aimed at refugees from the Syrian war transferred to the UK under the government’s “vulnerable person relocation scheme”.

The MoJ says it will also introduce greater flexibility around the evidence requirements for those who may find it difficult to provide evidence, such as children or persons suffering from a mental disability.

Since proposing the residence test, in its April 2013 consultation, Transforming Legal Aid: Delivering a more credible and efficient system, the MoJ has also introduced exemptions for judicial review detention cases, some trafficking victims, victims of domestic violence and forced marriage, some protection of children cases,

Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) cases and children under 12 months. Originally, exemptions were proposed for asylum cases and members of the Armed Forces.

Issue: 7597 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll