header-logo header-logo

New residence test exemptions

04 March 2014
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has made new concessions to its proposed 12-month lawful residence test for access to civil legal aid.
 

In its response to the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) reportinto the access to justice implications of legal aid reforms, published this week, the MoJ introduced two new categories of exemption - successful asylum seekers and refugees who didn’t claim asylum in the UK but are resettled or transferred here. The latter category is aimed at refugees from the Syrian war transferred to the UK under the government’s “vulnerable person relocation scheme”.

The MoJ says it will also introduce greater flexibility around the evidence requirements for those who may find it difficult to provide evidence, such as children or persons suffering from a mental disability.

Since proposing the residence test, in its April 2013 consultation, Transforming Legal Aid: Delivering a more credible and efficient system, the MoJ has also introduced exemptions for judicial review detention cases, some trafficking victims, victims of domestic violence and forced marriage, some protection of children cases,

Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) cases and children under 12 months. Originally, exemptions were proposed for asylum cases and members of the Armed Forces.

Issue: 7597 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll