header-logo header-logo

04 March 2014
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

New residence test exemptions

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has made new concessions to its proposed 12-month lawful residence test for access to civil legal aid.
 

In its response to the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) reportinto the access to justice implications of legal aid reforms, published this week, the MoJ introduced two new categories of exemption - successful asylum seekers and refugees who didn’t claim asylum in the UK but are resettled or transferred here. The latter category is aimed at refugees from the Syrian war transferred to the UK under the government’s “vulnerable person relocation scheme”.

The MoJ says it will also introduce greater flexibility around the evidence requirements for those who may find it difficult to provide evidence, such as children or persons suffering from a mental disability.

Since proposing the residence test, in its April 2013 consultation, Transforming Legal Aid: Delivering a more credible and efficient system, the MoJ has also introduced exemptions for judicial review detention cases, some trafficking victims, victims of domestic violence and forced marriage, some protection of children cases,

Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) cases and children under 12 months. Originally, exemptions were proposed for asylum cases and members of the Armed Forces.

Issue: 7597 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll