header-logo header-logo

04 February 2010 / David Tyme
Issue: 7403 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

New territory

David Tyme explores the territorial scope of unfair dismissals

Mr Duncombe was employed by the secretary of state for children, schools and families (the department) as a teacher to work in a European school in Germany. The majority of  teachers seconded to the school were centrally employed by the state.

However, teachers from the UK were usually employed by the local authority or by the school’s governing body. The prevailing Staff Regulations limits, save in exceptional circumstances, a secondment to nine years whereafter the secondment terminates.

Duncombe was employed on successive fixed term contracts, between January 1996 and September 2006 and commenced proceedings alleging unfair and wrongful dismissal following the expiration of his final fixed term contract.

The fundamental issue for determination was whether his contract of employment is to be viewed as a fixed term employment contract with an objectively justifiable maximum term of nine years or whether the contract was converted by virtue of the Fixed-Term Employees (Prevention of less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002 (SI 2002/2034) (The 2002 Regulations) into a permanent contract

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll