header-logo header-logo

04 February 2010 / David Tyme
Issue: 7403 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

New territory

David Tyme explores the territorial scope of unfair dismissals

Mr Duncombe was employed by the secretary of state for children, schools and families (the department) as a teacher to work in a European school in Germany. The majority of  teachers seconded to the school were centrally employed by the state.

However, teachers from the UK were usually employed by the local authority or by the school’s governing body. The prevailing Staff Regulations limits, save in exceptional circumstances, a secondment to nine years whereafter the secondment terminates.

Duncombe was employed on successive fixed term contracts, between January 1996 and September 2006 and commenced proceedings alleging unfair and wrongful dismissal following the expiration of his final fixed term contract.

The fundamental issue for determination was whether his contract of employment is to be viewed as a fixed term employment contract with an objectively justifiable maximum term of nine years or whether the contract was converted by virtue of the Fixed-Term Employees (Prevention of less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002 (SI 2002/2034) (The 2002 Regulations) into a permanent contract

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll