header-logo header-logo

New VHCC proposals top legal aid changes

01 January 2009
Issue: 7350+7351 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Legal aid

The Legal Services Commission is dropping hourly rates and turning tail on its plans to set up a panel of barristers for complex criminal cases. The Commission’s proposals, launched in December 2008, will create a panel of litigators and a list of accredited advocates for very high cost criminal cases (VHCCs).

Litigators will negotiate how much work they carry out in a contract, and cases will be structured around a series of core litigation tasks.

Advocates will be contracted for individual cases, and will be paid a combination of graduated fees for core advocacy tasks and negotiated rates for case specific tasks rather than hourly rates. Barristers boycotted a VHCC panel set up last January, forcing the Commission to drop its plans, and a revised scheme set up in its place is due to expire in July 2009.
Tim Dutton QC, immediate past chairman of the Bar, says: “The proposed scheme should provide a fair payment mechanism, which reflects the complexity of the cases in question, and the concomitant expertise required of those advocates who conduct them. It will deliver within budget.”

Civil legal aid will become fully electronic in 2010, under a “Delivery Transformation” scheme announced by the Commission in December.

Applications for certificates, the completion of financial means assessments, billing and bill payments will be done electronically. The commission
says the new system will speed up progress on cases and save up to £7m in costs a year.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll