header-logo header-logo

01 January 2009
Issue: 7350+7351 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

New VHCC proposals top legal aid changes

Legal aid

The Legal Services Commission is dropping hourly rates and turning tail on its plans to set up a panel of barristers for complex criminal cases. The Commission’s proposals, launched in December 2008, will create a panel of litigators and a list of accredited advocates for very high cost criminal cases (VHCCs).

Litigators will negotiate how much work they carry out in a contract, and cases will be structured around a series of core litigation tasks.

Advocates will be contracted for individual cases, and will be paid a combination of graduated fees for core advocacy tasks and negotiated rates for case specific tasks rather than hourly rates. Barristers boycotted a VHCC panel set up last January, forcing the Commission to drop its plans, and a revised scheme set up in its place is due to expire in July 2009.
Tim Dutton QC, immediate past chairman of the Bar, says: “The proposed scheme should provide a fair payment mechanism, which reflects the complexity of the cases in question, and the concomitant expertise required of those advocates who conduct them. It will deliver within budget.”

Civil legal aid will become fully electronic in 2010, under a “Delivery Transformation” scheme announced by the Commission in December.

Applications for certificates, the completion of financial means assessments, billing and bill payments will be done electronically. The commission
says the new system will speed up progress on cases and save up to £7m in costs a year.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Firm expands in London and Leeds with dual merger

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Agile firm expands employment team with two partner hires

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll