header-logo header-logo

26 January 2022
Issue: 7964 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

New year, new job?

It’s a great time to switch jobs, with legal vacancies at law firms and businesses achieving record highs in 2021 as companies sought extra legal expertise amid economic uncertainty

According to a report, ‘2021 in review: UK legal labour market trends’, by recruiters BCL Legal and data analytics firm Vacancysoft, legal jobs doubled in 2021 across England and Wales. By the end of 2021, private practice hiring was up 112% on the previous year, with the larger law firms recording an average three-to-four times more vacancies.

Eversheds Sutherland had the highest volume of vacancies, with a 253% year-on-year rise in new jobs. Pinsent Masons had the fastest growth, recording 562% more new jobs compared to 2020.

DAC Beachcroft, DWF, Addleshaw Goddard and Mills & Reeve also more than doubled their legal hires. TLT more than tripled, and Clifford Chance almost quintupled, recruitment on the previous year.

Mary Nowell, managing director at BCL Legal, said: ‘Last year was unprecedented in the legal recruitment sector.

‘In all regional markets and almost all disciplines, demand outstripped supply and firms were left to revise recruitment strategies to attract new talent, while also ensuring they retained talent to avoid further exacerbating the problem. It was a perfect storm; increasing work levels, flexible working policies emerging at most law firms and an increasingly mobile workforce adding pressure on almost all talent pools.’

In private practice, real estate was the most sought-after area. Legal vacancies in financial services doubled in 2021. However, banking produced the most vacancies, with hiring levels up 111%. Vacancies for lawyers in accounting and consultancy, and in insurance also rose.

In terms of sector, tech continues to be the largest employer of legal specialists, and recorded more than 800 legal vacancies in 2021 (a 90% rise). Demand soared in the energy and utilities sector, with a 94% rise in vacancies.

Issue: 7964 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

Nick Vernon of Walkers on swapping Birmingham for Bermuda and building an employment practice by the sea

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Global firm re-elects CEO for second term

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Business appoints managing director of operational excellence

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll