header-logo header-logo

Ex-tenants’ “housing” vendetta

17 September 2009
Categories: Legal News , Local government , Public , Housing , Community care
printer mail-detail

Court of Appeal rules council acted legitimately against anti-social former tenant

A local authority was within its rights in applying for a “housing-related” anti-social behaviour injunction (ASBI) against a man who harassed his former neighbours but was no longer a council tenant, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

In Swindon BC v Redpath [2009], Lord Justice Rix, considered the meaning of “housing-related conduct” in s 153A(1) of the Housing Act 1996.

The case turned on whether there was “a sufficient nexus between the local authority and its ex-tenant in respect of his anti-social behaviour against victims in the neighbourhood where he used to live so as to justify, in jurisdictional terms, the local authority’s continuing pursuit of a further anti-social behaviour injunction against its ex-tenant,” Rix LJ said.

The ex-tenant, Michael Redpath, had been evicted in 2006 from a secure tenancy in a village near Swindon following a series of alcohol-related incidents and a determined campaign of harassment against a neighbouring couple, who were home-owners. His behaviour continued. In 2008, the county court granted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll