header-logo header-logo

07 February 2008
Issue: 7307 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

News in Brief

Changes at the top

CHANGES AT THE TOP

The Legal Aid Practitioners Group (LAPG) has finally found a replacement for Richard Miller who left to join the Law Society last August. Carol Storer, a solicitor and legal services manager at Shelter, is taking over the role in the spring. Meanwhile, Jon Robins is joining the Legal Action Group later this month as communications and campaigns director. Robins currently edits the magazine Independent Lawyer and works as a freelance journalist.

 

MAKING A DIFFERENCE

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer has launched an international, externally assured corporate social responsibility (CSR) report—a first for a major international law firm. The report, Corporate Social Responsibility: Making a Difference around the World, covers Freshfields’ 26 offices worldwide and follows the release of the firm’s Londonfocused CSR report in 2006.

 

KINDER SURPRISE

Kinder eggs—“it’s chocolate and a toy and a surprise”, according to the adverts—could soon be outlawed if European Commission plans to improve toy safety in Europe are adopted. The Commission is proposing a range of measures aimed at enhancing the safety of toys by replacing and modernising the 20-year-old Toys Directive 88/378/EEC. One of the revisions would see the prohibition of toys which can only be accessed through eating food—sounding the death knell for the popular eggs.

 

ILEX CASEWORKERS

Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) designated caseworkers (DCWs) could be admitted into the Institute of Legal Executives (ILEX) for the first time later this year following an agreement in principle between the CPS and ILEX. Under the proposals, caseworkers who have undertaken the DCW training programme and have been designated by the director of public prosecutions to present hearings in magistrates’ courts would become CPS members of the institute.

 

 

 

PCT PAYS

The parents of a severely disabled adult have won the right to have payments for her care from their Primary Care Trust (PCT) made directly to them. As an NHS Continuing Healthcare patient, the responsibility for funding care for Julie Patnaik falls on the NHS, rather than the local social services department. After Sunderland Teaching PCT refused to pay the Patnaiks directly for their daughter’s care, they took the matter to judicial review. At a preliminary hearing the court dismissed the PCT’s claim that to make payments would open the floodgates to other NHS patients. Permission for the case to proceed to a full hearing was given but the PCT agreed to make payments to the Patnaiks, and to pay legal costs.

 

CHILD DEATHS

A review of child deaths has found that some recommendations made in Lord Lamming’s report into the death of Victoria Climbié have not been enacted. The study of the 161 most serious cases of child death or abuse found that 55% of children involved were known to children’s social care at the time of the incident. The report also showed that children’s social care had failed to take into account the past history of families where children suffered long-term abuse and had adopted a “start again syndrome” where the focus is on the present rather than tackling patterns of abuse. The study also found that more than half of the children involved in serious abuse had been living with domestic violence, parents with substance abuse problems or mental illness.

 

SECRET INQUESTS

The government intends to remove juries from some inquests at the request of the home secretary. The measures, contained in Pt 6 of the Counter-Terrorism Bill, also allow for inquests into terrorist-related deaths, which may involve the use of sensitive and specialist information, to go ahead without a public presence. The Ministry of Justice says the measures would be used sparingly and only in exceptional circumstances.

Issue: 7307 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll