header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
24 July 2009
Issue: 7379 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Firms pool for dispute resolution

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Twelve City law firms and the College of Law have launched what is believed to be the first training consortium in dispute resolution.

The consortium is a pooled structured training programme for junior dispute resolution lawyers. It is designed for lawyers from 0–3 years PQE, and enables them to train in the core areas of the litigation process.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Womble Bond Dickinson—Paula Myers

Womble Bond Dickinson—Paula Myers

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Paula Myers to private capital team in Leeds

mfg Solicitors—five promotions

mfg Solicitors—five promotions

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces five promotions at Birmingham office

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
Read All
42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court merger completed

Family set expands with the formal integration of 4 Brick Court into 42BR Barristers

Sting operation on solicitor backfires
The Court of Appeal has issued a stern warning to lawyers engaging in the practice of ‘privilege hunting’—obtaining an opponent’s legally privileged information through dishonest means
CILEX ‘disappointed’ by LSB report on Mazur
Legal executives have given a lukewarm reception to the Legal Services Board’s (LSB’s) final report from its regulatory review into Mazur advice and guidance
Ruling clarifies main housing duty
A homeless single parent offered accommodation in Derby has lost her Supreme Court appeal against the London council making the offer
No shield for spies, says Supreme Court
The Kingdom of Bahrain does not enjoy sovereign immunity from allegations it used surveillance software to spy on dissidents in the UK, the Supreme Court has held
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll