header-logo header-logo

28 February 2008 / Carolyn Regan
Issue: 7310 / Categories: Features , Company , Public , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Next steps for legal aid

Working together to transform legal aid is vital, says Carolyn Regan

The consultation on our initial proposals for best value tendering (BVT), Best Value Tendering for Criminal Defence Services: a Consultation Paper, closes on 3 March. These proposals were published in December 2007, together with other important next steps in the legal aid reforms.

I say “initial proposals” because the consultation is intended, subject to our consideration of the responses to it, to be the first of two. We are calling for early input from providers to give them maximum opportunity to contribute to how the BVT proposals develop. The reforms aim to deliver quality, access, and value for money, ensuring the future sustainability of services for the people who need them. Many who oppose change will say that the reforms threaten this, but the greatest threat is to do nothing.

Transforming legal aid is vital. We must move away from paying for hours worked instead of services delivered for clients (and the resulting unsustainable cost increases and inefficiencies)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll