header-logo header-logo

Next steps for legal aid

28 February 2008 / Carolyn Regan
Issue: 7310 / Categories: Features , Company , Public , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Working together to transform legal aid is vital, says Carolyn Regan

The consultation on our initial proposals for best value tendering (BVT), Best Value Tendering for Criminal Defence Services: a Consultation Paper, closes on 3 March. These proposals were published in December 2007, together with other important next steps in the legal aid reforms.

I say “initial proposals” because the consultation is intended, subject to our consideration of the responses to it, to be the first of two. We are calling for early input from providers to give them maximum opportunity to contribute to how the BVT proposals develop. The reforms aim to deliver quality, access, and value for money, ensuring the future sustainability of services for the people who need them. Many who oppose change will say that the reforms threaten this, but the greatest threat is to do nothing.

Transforming legal aid is vital. We must move away from paying for hours worked instead of services delivered for clients (and the resulting unsustainable cost increases and inefficiencies)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll