header-logo header-logo

Next steps for legal aid

28 February 2008 / Carolyn Regan
Issue: 7310 / Categories: Features , Company , Public , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Working together to transform legal aid is vital, says Carolyn Regan

The consultation on our initial proposals for best value tendering (BVT), Best Value Tendering for Criminal Defence Services: a Consultation Paper, closes on 3 March. These proposals were published in December 2007, together with other important next steps in the legal aid reforms.

I say “initial proposals” because the consultation is intended, subject to our consideration of the responses to it, to be the first of two. We are calling for early input from providers to give them maximum opportunity to contribute to how the BVT proposals develop. The reforms aim to deliver quality, access, and value for money, ensuring the future sustainability of services for the people who need them. Many who oppose change will say that the reforms threaten this, but the greatest threat is to do nothing.

Transforming legal aid is vital. We must move away from paying for hours worked instead of services delivered for clients (and the resulting unsustainable cost increases and inefficiencies)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll