header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
28 February 2008 / Carolyn Regan
Issue: 7310 / Categories: Features , Company , Public , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Next steps for legal aid

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Working together to transform legal aid is vital, says Carolyn Regan

The consultation on our initial proposals for best value tendering (BVT), Best Value Tendering for Criminal Defence Services: a Consultation Paper, closes on 3 March. These proposals were published in December 2007, together with other important next steps in the legal aid reforms.

I say “initial proposals” because the consultation is intended, subject to our consideration of the responses to it, to be the first of two. We are calling for early input from providers to give them maximum opportunity to contribute to how the BVT proposals develop. The reforms aim to deliver quality, access, and value for money, ensuring the future sustainability of services for the people who need them. Many who oppose change will say that the reforms threaten this, but the greatest threat is to do nothing.

Transforming legal aid is vital. We must move away from paying for hours worked instead of services delivered for clients (and the resulting unsustainable cost increases and inefficiencies)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll