header-logo header-logo

02 August 2016
Issue: 7710 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Nicholas Lavender QC—Serle Court

nicholas_lavender_02_2

QC appointed High Court Judge 

Nicholas Lavender QC, of Serle Court, has been appointed a High Court Judge assigned to the Queen’s Bench Division. Nicholas will take his seat on the bench later this year. His appointment follows an established tradition at Serle Court of producing some of the country’s top commercial judges and arbitrators. 

Nicholas has practised commercial law at Serle Court since it was founded 16 years ago, acting in a wide range of high-profile trust disputes, including the long-running Weisfisch litigation in the Bahamas, which broke new legal ground, as well as big-ticket commercial cases, including the Hollywood film finance litigation, and high-profile banking cases, such as JP Morgan v Springwell on the miss-selling of investments. 

Nicholas was called to the Bar in 1989 and took Silk in 2008. He has held the position of Deputy High Court judge for 3 years, and is also a recorder, a Bencher of the Inner Temple, a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and a mediator. 

Nicholas says: “It has been a pleasure to be part of Serle Court, and to work on some of the most interesting and challenging commercial and trust disputes, with the support of a great team. Whilst I look forward to my new role, I will miss working with everyone at Serle Court.” 

Chief Executive of Serle Court, John Petrie, comments: “Serle Court takes great pride in its reputation for fielding barristers at the very top of the profession, like Nicholas. His appointment as a High Court judge confirms this. His practice has been very tightly aligned to Serle Court’s core expertise in complex commercial litigation and offshore trusts work. While he will be sorely missed as a popular colleague, we wish him all the best in his new role.” 

Issue: 7710 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll