header-logo header-logo

The NLJ Column

18 October 2007
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Opinion , Legal News
printer mail-detail

Education, not more legislation, will help the public understand
—and respect—the law

Much lip service is paid to egalitarian access to legal education. The dean of the law faculty of the University of Oxford recently announced to graduate students at the start of their term that they may well be studying in lectures cheek by jowl with the general public, who would be able to walk in off the streets and be educated by Oxford’s finest minds. At first blush, one could be forgiven for thinking that the City of Oxford was on the threshold of becoming one of the most legally knowledgeable populations in the UK.

But, like all statements of intent, when it comes to legally educating the public there is less to this than meets the eye. On closer consideration of the university’s lecture admissions policy (available on its website and printed lecture sheets), a “lecture permit” must be obtained by the general public at least three working days in advance of their proposed attendance.

learning lessons

It is not acceptable, in a society

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll