header-logo header-logo

The NLJ Column

13 April 2007 / John Cooper KC
Issue: 7268 / Categories: Blogs , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

The jurisprudential gold standard needs to be revisited

Following the release of the British sailors from Iran, there has been considerable interest in why the Navy personnel condemned British involvement in Iraq and made admissions of their alleged incursions into Iran’s waters. The reason the sailors gave was that they had been tortured. The details of this ‘torture’ ranged from hearing carpentry outside their cells (implicitly linked to manufacture of their coffins), being told they would never see their children again, and, terrifyingly, being told they looked like Mr Bean.

Minimum severity threshold

There are some who sympathise with the sailors when clearly a degree of intimidation forced them to appear craven on world television. But loose use of the word torture is misleading.

It is becoming very difficult to establish a finding of torture in the European court according to European Convention on Human Rights jurisprudence and the word should not be used lightly. The threshold created to filter lesser claims of human indignity, somewhat short of torture, known as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll