header-logo header-logo

05 June 2008 / John Cooper KC
Issue: 7324 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

The NLJ Column

The role of evil in the criminal justice system

It is not unusual to hear the police, judges, journalists or any other interested party, describe the commission of certain crimes as evil. The categories of such offences are well-honed, particularly despicable murder or violence nearly always comes top of the list of evil human behaviour.

More particularly, it is sentenced as such. The judge in his sentencing remarks will refer to the “evil” of the offence, for which a lengthy, condign sentence of imprisonment is the only response.

If the Law Commission's recommendations for the reform of murder become law, the criminal justice system will have to grapple with the concept of first and second degree murder, a conviction for first degree murder—the more heinous category—attracting harsher sentences, entrenching a categorisation approach to crime and sentencing, based at least in part, upon how heinous the offence is.

Evil v Mental Illness

If evil exists as a force which can be quantified, then sending people to prison for committing such crimes should make

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll