header-logo header-logo

04 October 2018
Issue: 7811 / Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ Profile: David Pryce, Fenchurch Law

david_pryce_002

In the first of a special series of LexisNexis Legal Awards Profiles, we speak to David Pryce, the managing partner of 2018's Law Firm of the Year, Fenchurch Law

What was most satisfying about seeing your work recognised at the LexisNexis Legal Awards this year? 

Seeing the positive effect on our team.  It was incredibly motivating and rewarding for everyone, and whether it’s in business or in sport, winning things helps massively in creating a sense of shared identity.

What was your route into the profession? 

A degree in English Literature from Birmingham University, followed by a conversion course and the LPC at BPP in London. When I was there ,BPP was still quite small and it had a really friendly atmosphere. The conversion course was probably my most enjoyable year in education.

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

Trying (and often failing) to manage the competing interests of different stakeholders, so that at any given time everyone connected to the firm feels like they're winning.

Which person within the legal profession inspires you most? 

My first boss was a solicitor called Michael Scanlan. He showed me that being a lawyer can be fun, and that what you can do is more important than what you can’t do.

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career? 

Even if I wasn’t a lawyer I’d still want to spend my time managing a law firm. I’ve never wanted to do anything else.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?

 Harvey Specter from the TV programme Suits, mainly because he’s responsible for the funniest advert I can remember seeing on the side of a London bus: 'If Harvey was on this bus, this bus would be awesome'. Still makes me chuckle.

What change would you make to the profession? 

To find a way of ensuring that everybody can access high quality legal advice at a price that’s affordable, but with no compromise on quality. As a profession we’re still some way from achieving that.

How do you relax? 

I love trail running. I’m lucky to live in a beautiful part of South Oxfordshire, surrounded by woodland. I can just lace up my shoes, run out of the door, and immerse myself in nature for an hour or two.

Entries for the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2019 are now open, and should be submitted at www.lexisnexislegalawards.co.uk by the closing date of Friday 16 November 2018. The awards ceremony will be held at the Sheraton Grand London Park Lane on Wednesday 13 March 2019.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

Mark Hastings, founding partner of Quillon Law, on turning dreams into reality and pushing back on preconceptions about partnership

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

New family law partner for Italian and international clients appointed

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Firm elects new chair of tier 1 ranked employment department

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll