header-logo header-logo

NLJ Profile: David Pryce, Fenchurch Law

04 October 2018
Issue: 7811 / Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
david_pryce_002

In the first of a special series of LexisNexis Legal Awards Profiles, we speak to David Pryce, the managing partner of 2018's Law Firm of the Year, Fenchurch Law

What was most satisfying about seeing your work recognised at the LexisNexis Legal Awards this year? 

Seeing the positive effect on our team.  It was incredibly motivating and rewarding for everyone, and whether it’s in business or in sport, winning things helps massively in creating a sense of shared identity.

What was your route into the profession? 

A degree in English Literature from Birmingham University, followed by a conversion course and the LPC at BPP in London. When I was there ,BPP was still quite small and it had a really friendly atmosphere. The conversion course was probably my most enjoyable year in education.

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

Trying (and often failing) to manage the competing interests of different stakeholders, so that at any given time everyone connected to the firm feels like they're winning.

Which person within the legal profession inspires you most? 

My first boss was a solicitor called Michael Scanlan. He showed me that being a lawyer can be fun, and that what you can do is more important than what you can’t do.

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career? 

Even if I wasn’t a lawyer I’d still want to spend my time managing a law firm. I’ve never wanted to do anything else.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?

 Harvey Specter from the TV programme Suits, mainly because he’s responsible for the funniest advert I can remember seeing on the side of a London bus: 'If Harvey was on this bus, this bus would be awesome'. Still makes me chuckle.

What change would you make to the profession? 

To find a way of ensuring that everybody can access high quality legal advice at a price that’s affordable, but with no compromise on quality. As a profession we’re still some way from achieving that.

How do you relax? 

I love trail running. I’m lucky to live in a beautiful part of South Oxfordshire, surrounded by woodland. I can just lace up my shoes, run out of the door, and immerse myself in nature for an hour or two.

Entries for the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2019 are now open, and should be submitted at www.lexisnexislegalawards.co.uk by the closing date of Friday 16 November 2018. The awards ceremony will be held at the Sheraton Grand London Park Lane on Wednesday 13 March 2019.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll