header-logo header-logo

03 April 2020
Issue: 7882 / Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ PROFILE: Ryan Whelan

Ryan Whelan, the 2020 LexisNexis Legal Personality of the Year, pays tribute to Emirates, brilliant mentors and inspirational figures including his former client Gina Martin & his son Ralph

What was your route into the profession?

Read law at Aberdeen University before training with Pinsent Masons. Joined Gibson Dunn almost a year after qualifying. I have been with the firm six years and work in the arbitration team from our London and Dubai offices.

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

Juggling extensive travel with other professional and family commitments can be difficult. I owe a great deal to Emirates and their route network. For many years they’ve made sure that I’ve not had to miss an occasion or otherwise let anyone down. More fundamentally, I think every lawyer finds it difficult, at least initially, to find their voice and way of lawyering. I was fortunate to have truly brilliant mentors, including Fraser McMillan, Brandon Nolan, Graham Lovett and Paul McBride QC.

Which person within the legal profession inspires you most?

Our profession has so many inspirational figures that I find it hard to restrict myself to one. Hopefully you’ll allow me three.

  • First, for her talent, humility and approachability, Lady Hale.
  • Second, for being a master of written and oral advocacy, Sir James Eadie QC.
  • Third, for her passion, tenacity and eloquence, the Secret Barrister (who yes, I suspect, is female).

And these are just the three lawyers that spring to mind as having immediate name recognition; I really could go on… and then I’d definitely distort this question further by mentioning my former client Gina Martin. She may not be a qualified lawyer but she is a tremendous advocate, and an example to us all in terms of what it means to be brave and stoic.  

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?

Without a moment’s hesitation, I’d choose to be a billionaire philanthropist. Failing that, filmmaker. Having that platform and creative freedom would be an extraordinary privilege. I’d focus on producing thought pieces but, under the veneer of showing versatility, I’d dabble in Richard Cutis-esque romantic comedies. In terms of style, think Steven Spielberg meets Louis Theroux but with a hint of non-linear Tarantino.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?

Fred Gailey from Miracle on 34th Street: he was creative, tactical and persuasive in the highest of high stake litigations, what’s not to love?

What change would you make to the profession?

I’d improve legal aid remuneration. Legal aid is an investment. Public confidence in justice, the rule of law and society itself depends on having intelligent lawyers working on legal aid cases to ensure voices are heard and decisions tested. Our legal aid lawyers should not have to be self-sacrificing. We as a society should pay them fairly for the work that they do, the contribution that they make. 

How do you relax?

Laughing with family and friends, ideally over good food and with my son Ralph chairing proceedings from his high chair. Less frequently, while at the gym, playing football or being beaten by my wife at tennis—there’s no chivalry involved in my defeats, she’s just far better than I am! 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll