header-logo header-logo

12 September 2025
Issue: 8130 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Arbitration law faces global crossroads

229563
Guy Pendell, chair of the International Chamber of Commerce UK’s Arbitration & ADR Committee and partner at CMS, calls for harmonisation in the laws governing arbitration agreements across jurisdictions

Pendell examines the contrasting approaches of courts in France, England and Wales, and Singapore, as highlighted in the Kabab-Ji case. French courts prioritise the law of the seat, while English courts apply the law of the underlying contract unless otherwise agreed.

Singapore adopts a nuanced three-step test. England’s upcoming Arbitration Act 2025 introduces section 6A, defaulting to the law of the seat unless expressly agreed otherwise. Pendell argues that a uniform approach would provide certainty for commercial parties, but in its absence, practitioners should make express choices to avoid disputes.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The government has pledged to ‘move fast’ to protect children from harm caused by artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, and could impose limits on social media as early as the summer
All eyes will be on the Court of Appeal (or its YouTube livestream) next week as it sits to consider the controversial Mazur judgment
An NHS Foundation Trust breached a consultant’s contract by delegating an investigation into his knowledge of nurse Lucy Letby’s case
Draft guidance for schools on how to support gender-questioning pupils provides ‘more clarity’, but headteachers may still need legal advice, an education lawyer has said
Litigation funder Innsworth Capital, which funded behemoth opt-out action Merricks v Mastercard, can bring a judicial review, the High Court ruled last week
back-to-top-scroll