header-logo header-logo

02 August 2024
Issue: 8082 / Categories: Legal News , Health
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Arguments against controversial SIHIS pilot for head injuries

184290
Family lawyers have raised serious concerns about the Suspected Inflicted Head Injury Service (SIHIS)

In this week’s NLJ, Max Konarek, partner and joint head of the family and childcare department, GT Stewart Solicitors, explains what is causing such controversy and why the SIHIS, which is already being piloted in some courts, needs a major rethink.

SIHIS uses a template document to provide a single comprehensive report from expert clinicians. However, Konarek writes: ‘The cross examination of medical experts in [cases where medical experts are against your client in the reports they have written] by specialist and highly skilled advocates can lead you down a path that was not expected or anticipated, resulting in a child going back to their family rather than being placed outside of it, either in foster care or adoption.’

Moreover, Konarek says, ‘this is not as rare an occurrence as many would think’. 

Issue: 8082 / Categories: Legal News , Health
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll