header-logo header-logo

06 November 2026
Issue: 8184 / Categories: Legal News , Environment , Criminal
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Beyond environmental offences

263044
© Getty images
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed

Writing in NLJ this week, Lily Beweley-West, associate at Corker Binning, examines former Southern Water chief executive Matthew Wright’s unsuccessful challenge to a conspiracy-to-defraud prosecution.

The allegations concern manipulation of wastewater treatment works to circumvent quality monitoring. The court rejected Wright’s narrow reading of the agency’s powers, while also rejecting its claim to a general power to prosecute any offence.

The case carries lessons on privacy and candour. Wright’s anonymity was overturned, with the court reaffirming that restrictions on open justice must be ‘truly exceptional and strictly necessary’.

Both sides were criticised over failures to inform the court of an adjournment affecting an urgent application.

Beweley-West explains why the decision matters beyond environmental enforcement, highlighting the scope of specialist regulators’ powers and the continuing disclosure duties accompanying public law remedies.

Issue: 8184 / Categories: Legal News , Environment , Criminal
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll