header-logo header-logo

23 January 2026
Issue: 8146 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Civil way , Landlord&tenant , Family
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Bundles, bots & bonkers rent

Civil justice lurches onward with characteristic eccentricity. In his latest Civil Way column, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist, surveys a procedural landscape featuring 19-page bundle rules, digital possession claims, and rent laws he labels ‘bonkers’

Family practitioners face new permission hurdles for appeals and must master e-bundles—five days early, Arial preferred.

Meanwhile, the Renters’ Rights Act gives tenants a tactical gift: challenge a rent rise and enjoy a ‘honeymoon’ delay while tribunals buckle under volume. Gold predicts an ‘avalanche’ of claims.

Elsewhere, the Online Procedure Rule Committee promises something ‘simpler and groovier’ than the CPR, while digital assets quietly become a new class of litigable property. Costs creep up, base rates fall, and access portals expand. Reform marches on—but not always in a straight line.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll