header-logo header-logo

26 September 2025
Issue: 8132 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Health
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: DNA evidence—justice on ice?

230749
In this week's NLJ, Steven Ball of Red Lion Chambers unpacks how advances in forensic science finally unmasked Ryland Headley, jailed in 2025 for the 1967 rape and murder of 75-year-old Louisa Dunne. Preserved swabs and palm prints lay dormant for decades until DNA-17 profiling produced a billion-to-one match

Headley, now 92, was convicted at Bristol Crown Court after chillingly similar prior offences were exposed.

But Ball contrasts this triumph with the case of Peter Sullivan, wrongfully jailed for 38 years for a 1986 murder on flawed evidence. His eventual exoneration underscores both the power and perils of forensic science. The judgment, Ball argues, shows justice delayed need not be denied—but also highlights the criminal justice system’s duty to guard against miscarriages when science is in flux.

Cold cases may yet reopen, proving that no crime is too old for the truth to emerge.

Issue: 8132 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Health
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll