
The wife was awarded 43% of total assets, including 40% of the port proceeds. The judge penalised the husband’s obstructive behaviour with cost orders and asset valuation adjustments.
Notably, the trial embraced tech-savvy management, using tablets for bundles to streamline proceedings. The judgment offers a cautionary tale on disclosure failures and a pragmatic view on litigation costs, which reached £1.44m—deemed proportionate given the case’s complexity.