header-logo header-logo

03 July 2026
Issue: 8168 / Categories: Legal News , Dispute resolution , International , Sanctions
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Global enforcement enters a new era

253821
© Getty images
Winning a judgment is only half the battle when sanctions, geopolitics and offshore structures complicate recovery

Writing in NLJ this week, Tom Clark, Jack Barlow and Taronish Mistry of Stewarts argue that cross-border enforcement has become more challenging, even though legal frameworks remain broadly effective.

They explain that sanctions, particularly those linked to the US financial system, increasingly create practical barriers, while sophisticated ownership structures make asset tracing harder. Even so, they contend the law continues to adapt through disclosure orders, tracing remedies and greater transparency in offshore jurisdictions.

The authors reject claims of systemic decline, suggesting disputes themselves have simply become larger and more complex. Their key message is that ‘enforcement is no longer solely a question of legal entitlement’ but careful strategy can still deliver results. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll