header-logo header-logo

14 November 2025
Issue: 8139 / Categories: Legal News , Arbitration , ADR , International , Dispute resolution
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Malaysia’s arbitration overhaul

235675
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal

Coming into force on 1 January 2026, the new suite unifies six frameworks—arbitration, Islamic arbitration, mediation, sports, adjudication, and domain name disputes.

The 2026 rules embed transparency by mandating disclosure of third-party funders, formalise the new AIAC Court of Arbitration, and expand eligibility for fast-track proceedings to disputes under US$3m. They also introduce mandatory technical reviews of draft awards and encourage diversity in arbitrator appointments.

Choi notes that these changes reflect Malaysia’s bid to modernise its dispute resolution landscape, aligning it with global arbitral practices and boosting investor confidence through procedural clarity, speed, and accountability.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll