header-logo header-logo

10 July 2026
Issue: 8169 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services , Regulatory , Career focus
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Mazur ruling offers CILEX a fresh start

254475
© Getty images
The Court of Appeal's decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP has lifted months of uncertainty for Chartered Legal Executives while prompting a rethink of regulation and supervision

Writing in NLJ this week, John Barwick, chief executive officer of CILEx Regulation, says the judgment has created an opportunity to strengthen standards rather than simply restore the status quo.

New guidance clarifies that unauthorised staff may undertake litigation tasks provided an authorised lawyer retains responsibility and supervision is 'proportionate, risk-based and evidenced'. Barwick says almost 1,200 Chartered Legal Executives have since secured litigation practice rights, calling it the 'silver lining' from the litigation.

He also acknowledges lessons from the regulator's handling of the dispute, including confusion over practice rights and regulatory roles. Looking ahead, he argues the focus must now shift to improving systems, rebuilding confidence and ensuring consumer protection through 'a well-regulated, understood and respected profession'. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll