header-logo header-logo

10 July 2026
Issue: 8169 / Categories: Legal News , Company , Criminal , Liability , Risk management , Compliance
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: New offence rules widen corporate criminal exposure

254468
© Getty images
A little-noticed provision of the Crime and Policing Act 2026 has fundamentally expanded corporate criminal liability

Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves, lecturer in law at York St John University, explains that s 250 replaces the old 'directing mind' test with a broader senior manager attribution model covering all criminal offences, not just economic crime. Crucially, there is no 'reasonable procedures' defence, meaning organisations may face liability regardless of the strength of their compliance systems.

Hargreaves says businesses should urgently review governance, training, authority structures and insurance, while also reassessing self-reporting because deferred prosecution agreements remain unavailable for many newly in-scope offences.

His warning is stark: practitioners who delay advising clients until test cases emerge 'may find that the first cases concern their own clients'. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll