header-logo header-logo

10 July 2026 / Robert Hargreaves
Issue: 8169 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Company , Liability , Compliance , Risk management
printer mail-detail

Section 250: beyond the directing mind

254468
© Getty images

Robert Hargreaves explains how the Crime & Policing Act rewrites corporate criminal liability

  • Section 250 of the Crime and Policing Act 2026, now in force, extends the senior manager attribution test from specified economic crimes to all criminal offences.
  • There is no reasonable procedures defence: a corporate is exposed to liability regardless of the quality of its compliance framework.
  • Practitioners advising corporate clients must act now: risk assessments, governance mapping, senior manager training, and self-reporting strategies all require urgent review.

The Crime and Policing Act 2026 (CPA 2026) received royal assent on 29 April 2026. Its scope is broad: retail crime, antisocial behaviour, knife crime, sexual offending, terrorism, and policing powers all feature. Within Part 17 (Miscellaneous and general), however, sits a reform of immediate and profound significance to corporate practitioners.

Section 250 came into force on 29 June 2026, by virtue of s 255(3)(k), which commences the section at the end of the period of two months beginning with the day

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll