header-logo header-logo

24 July 2026
Issue: 8171 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Child law
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Raising the age bar

255691
© The Bar Council
Calls to raise the age of criminal responsibility from 10 to 14 have been renewed, with the Bar Council arguing the current threshold criminalises children too early and risks pushing them towards lifelong offending

Writing in NLJ this week, Kirsty Brimelow KC, chair of the Bar Council, says developmental neuroscience, psychology and international standards all support reform. She argues England and Wales are outliers in Europe and that criminalisation should give way to diversion, rehabilitation and welfare-based intervention.

Citing evidence that early justice involvement increases reoffending, she writes: ‘The measure of a justice system lies not in how early it punishes children but in how wisely it protects their future.’ 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces promotions at Ludlow office

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints partner in Leeds residential team

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
The Court of Appeal was entitled to uphold the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, according to an analysis of the ruling
back-to-top-scroll