header-logo header-logo

17 July 2026
Issue: 8170 / Categories: Legal News , Sanctions , Criminal , International , Compliance , Transport , Commercial
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Sanctions compliance enters a new era

254932
© Pixel8000/Shutterstock
Businesses face a step change in sanctions compliance after sweeping UK reforms targeting proxies, shadow fleets and Russian oil exports

Writing in NLJ this week, Paul Henty, partner at Beale & Company Solicitors LLP, says the supposedly 'miscellaneous' amendments are anything but. New 'end-user controls' mean companies can commit criminal offences if they ignore government notifications identifying apparently innocent counterparties as proxies for sanctioned states. The Russia amendments also target 'oil laundering' through third-country refineries, widen restrictions on maritime services and add construction services to prohibited professional services.

Henty warns enforcement is tightening, with larger civil penalties, strict liability and increasing expectations around due diligence. Screening lists alone are no longer enough, he argues. Instead, businesses must exercise 'active vigilance', investigating supply chains, counterparties and regulatory notices if they are to avoid potentially costly enforcement action.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll