header-logo header-logo

16 October 2026
Issue: 8181 / Categories: Legal News , Non disclosure agreements , Employment
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Silence comes dear

261514
© Getty images
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect

Writing in NLJ this week, Louise Price of Doughty Street Chambers and Jennifer Leeder of Birketts examine the proposed regime under the Employment Rights Act 2025.

Terms preventing workers from discussing relevant harassment or discrimination will become void, including clauses in settlement agreements and ACAS settlements.

However, regulations may preserve limited ‘excepted agreements’. Proposed safeguards include independent written legal advice, informed consent and a 14-day cooling-off period.

Whether employers should be allowed to suggest an NDA remains unresolved. A prohibition could complicate negotiations, while cooling-off rights could make settlements immediately before tribunal hearings harder to secure.

Existing NDAs will not be retrospectively invalidated, and commercial confidentiality agreements remain unaffected.

The authors urge employers to review templates and remind lawyers that NDAs ‘should not be used routinely’ under regulatory guidance.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Shakespeare Martineau—Molly Rae

Shakespeare Martineau—Molly Rae

Shakespeare Martineau boosts Sheffield corporate team with new appointment

Stone King—Clare Harris

Stone King—Clare Harris

Stone King appoints new head of trusts and estates to spearhead growth as expansion continues

Browne Jacobson—David Hill

Browne Jacobson—David Hill

Browne Jacobson appoints David Hill as new health and life sciences partner with UK and international experience

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll