header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: A UK written constitution? No thanks!

23 February 2024
Issue: 8060 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
160023

Could the UK ever have a written constitution, and how would it affect the UK Supreme Court?

In this week’s NLJ, Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC looks across the pond to the US Supreme Court, which has powers to ‘nullify legislation’ by declaring it incompatible with the written US constitution.

Bindman highlights the disadvantages of the US system. He writes that, in the UK, there ‘are still politicians who favour a written constitution. The politicisation of the US Supreme Court should be a powerful warning against it.’

Is it inevitable that a written constitution would undermine judicial independence? Bindman lists the many far-reaching judgments in the US since the last three appointments were made. He discusses former US president Donald Trump’s recent involvement in court cases and also notes recent political pressures that have come about in the UK.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll