header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Can blockchain forget?

03 September 2021
Issue: 7946 / Categories: Legal News , Cyber , Media
printer mail-detail
To what extent does the right to be forgotten apply to blockchain, the technology behind Bitcoin and other ledger-based systems? Not only is it technically impossible but, following the end of the post-Brexit transition period, the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) no longer strictly applies (although the GDPR’s provisions have been incorporated into domestic law).

To what extent does the right to be forgotten apply to blockchain, the technology behind Bitcoin and other ledger-based systems? Not only is it technically impossible but, following the end of the post-Brexit transition period, the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) no longer strictly applies (although the GDPR’s provisions have been incorporated into domestic law).

It’s a fascinating conundrum and specialist lawyers may need to be involved in blockchain projects from the outset ‘to assess their suitability for compliance’, according to Dean Armstrong QC & Paul Schwartfeger, of 36 Commercial, writing in this week’s NLJ.

They write: ‘The technology-agnostic nature of the GDPR ignores entirely the realities of whether (and how) the right might be realised.

‘Indeed, when it comes to blockchain, this agnosticism creates something of a paradox. That is that, while the right is legally enshrined, it is also seemingly technically impossible to achieve, given the mantra that data stored on a blockchain is immutable. This fundamental issue, having real relevance to public or permissionless blockchains which, for example, underpin Bitcoin and Ethereum, has been the subject of much debate since the inception of the GDPR.’

In their article, Armstrong & Schwartfeger identify some possible solutions as well as guidance on how data controllers might respond to erasure requests.

Issue: 7946 / Categories: Legal News , Cyber , Media
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll