header-logo header-logo

26 June 2021
Issue: 7938 / Categories: Legal News , Charities
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Charities & COVID-19

Charities lost out but will writing peaked as news coverage sent memento mori to the nation
Charities are likely to suffer an unexpected side-effect of COVID-19 this year―a dip in legacy money left in people’s wills.


In 2019, charities received more than £3bn in legacy income, but a 15% drop is predicted for 2020 once the figures are tallied, Debra Burton, partner, and Tamsin Wooldridge, solicitor, in the contentious probate team at Shakespeare Martineau, write in this week's Charities Appeals Supplement.


In this article, Burton and Wooldridge explain the reasons for the dip, which is expected to be temporary.

They also note how the number of wills being written tracked the news agenda during the pandemic, peaking on the day the prime minister went into hospital and the resulting headlines sent a memento mori to the people of the UK. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll