header-logo header-logo

24 March 2021
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Charities
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Crucial implications of Kids Company case

The disqualification case against the trustees and CEO of the charity Kids Company was dismissed by the High Court last month―the first case in which the court had to decide whether a CEO would be a de facto director of that charity

The decision has crucial implications for the charity sector and the volunteers needed to run it, Natasha Jackson, barrister, & Katharine Bailey, pupil, of 3 Hare Court, write in this week’s NLJ.

Former CEO Camila Batmanghelidjh founded the charity in 1996 to help children who were falling through the cracks in mainstream services, but it collapsed in 2015 after facing financial difficulties. The High Court found that Batmanghelidjh was not a director and none of the trustees were unfit to be directors.

Jackson & Bailey spell out the implications of this important case. They write the case ‘is particularly notable for the strongly-worded judicial observations on the requirement for fairness and balance towards defendants, and the stark recommendations issued to the Official Receiver on case presentation’. 

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Charities
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll