header-logo header-logo

14 May 2021
Issue: 7932 / Categories: Legal News , Tax , International justice
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Danes thwarted in mega tax scandal litigation

48964
Behemoth case SKAT, brought by the Danish tax authorities in hot pursuit of £1.5bn lost in alleged dividend tax fraud, was one of the biggest civil litigation claims to come before the English courts, writes Rosenblatt senior associate Nick Leigh in this week’s NLJ.

The Danish state was this week ordered to pay the defendants indemnity costs, in a judgment that did not shy from criticising the ferocity of the claimant’s pursuit. Last month, the Danes lost the case. More than 100 defendants were involved and the trial was anticipated to last a year. The alleged fraud has been a high-profile scandal in the Danish media.

Mr Justice Andrew Baker, however, was able to dismiss all the claims in one go in the first of two mini-trials to determine preliminary issues. Leigh writes: ‘What was the cause? The Revenue Rule.’ 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll