header-logo header-logo

04 April 2025
Issue: 8111 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Nuisance
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: ‘Ordinary’ use in a nuisance nursery case

214630
Are children too noisy? In this week’s NLJ, Tricia Hemans and Daniel Black, Falcon Chambers, analyse a recent case on nuisance.

Dennis v Head Start Day Nursery is one of nuisance law’s quirkier cases, and sheds light on the development of this legal area post-Fearn v Tate, which concerned art gallery visitors taking an interest in the goings-on in nearby glass-walled flats.

The authors consider the following: ‘The issue of ordinary use was not explored in Head Start, the threshold test not having been met. Taking a foray into the hypothetical, one does wonder what the court might have made of that. If there were high levels of noise which objectively could amount to a substantial interference, would the use of the property as a nursery be considered ordinary?’ 
Issue: 8111 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Nuisance
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Katten Muchin Rosenman—Charlotte Hill

Katten Muchin Rosenman—Charlotte Hill

Katten strengthens financial markets and funds group in London

Hugh James—Keith Cundall & Lee Hart

Hugh James—Keith Cundall & Lee Hart

Hugh James expands national Serious Injury team with two new Partners

HFW—Rémi Ducloyer

HFW—Rémi Ducloyer

HFW continues Paris office growth with public law Partner hire

NEWS
The Court of Appeal's decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP has lifted months of uncertainty for Chartered Legal Executives while prompting a rethink of regulation and supervision
The assisted dying debate returns to Westminster as Lauren Edwards MP reintroduces legislation that stalled in the House of Lords last session despite clearing the Commons
A little-noticed provision of the Crime and Policing Act 2026 has fundamentally expanded corporate criminal liability
Artificial intelligence is transforming legal practice, but careless reliance on it is creating growing professional risks
The law offers cohabiting couples surprisingly greater protection after one partner dies than when they separate during life
back-to-top-scroll