header-logo header-logo

04 April 2025
Issue: 8111 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Nuisance
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: ‘Ordinary’ use in a nuisance nursery case

214630
Are children too noisy? In this week’s NLJ, Tricia Hemans and Daniel Black, Falcon Chambers, analyse a recent case on nuisance.

Dennis v Head Start Day Nursery is one of nuisance law’s quirkier cases, and sheds light on the development of this legal area post-Fearn v Tate, which concerned art gallery visitors taking an interest in the goings-on in nearby glass-walled flats.

The authors consider the following: ‘The issue of ordinary use was not explored in Head Start, the threshold test not having been met. Taking a foray into the hypothetical, one does wonder what the court might have made of that. If there were high levels of noise which objectively could amount to a substantial interference, would the use of the property as a nursery be considered ordinary?’ 
Issue: 8111 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Nuisance
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The government has pledged to ‘move fast’ to protect children from harm caused by artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, and could impose limits on social media as early as the summer
All eyes will be on the Court of Appeal (or its YouTube livestream) next week as it sits to consider the controversial Mazur judgment
An NHS Foundation Trust breached a consultant’s contract by delegating an investigation into his knowledge of nurse Lucy Letby’s case
Draft guidance for schools on how to support gender-questioning pupils provides ‘more clarity’, but headteachers may still need legal advice, an education lawyer has said
Litigation funder Innsworth Capital, which funded behemoth opt-out action Merricks v Mastercard, can bring a judicial review, the High Court ruled last week
back-to-top-scroll