header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Police misconduct policers fear prospect of being sued

23 September 2022
Issue: 7995 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
Who polices the police and should they be given immunity from suit? Barrister and journalist Veronica Cowan poses this question in NLJ this week.

Those who police the police are Legally Qualified Chairs and Independent Panel Members (LQCs and IPMs), who are appointed by Police and Crime Commissioners, to serve on police misconduct hearing panels. They need to do so without fear or favour yet, as Cowan reports, LQCs and IPMs are withdrawing their services because they fear being sued for acts or omissions of the panel, following a recent case.

Cowan writes: ‘This is challenging, important and responsible work, yet, while those who sit in courts and tribunals have judicial immunity, because they are judicial appointments, LQCs and IPMs do not, despite having to fulfil the criteria for such in order to be appointed.’ 

Read Veronica's article 'Policing the police' here.
Issue: 7995 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Regulatory
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll