header-logo header-logo

23 September 2022
Issue: 7995 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Police misconduct policers fear prospect of being sued

Who polices the police and should they be given immunity from suit? Barrister and journalist Veronica Cowan poses this question in NLJ this week.

Those who police the police are Legally Qualified Chairs and Independent Panel Members (LQCs and IPMs), who are appointed by Police and Crime Commissioners, to serve on police misconduct hearing panels. They need to do so without fear or favour yet, as Cowan reports, LQCs and IPMs are withdrawing their services because they fear being sued for acts or omissions of the panel, following a recent case.

Cowan writes: ‘This is challenging, important and responsible work, yet, while those who sit in courts and tribunals have judicial immunity, because they are judicial appointments, LQCs and IPMs do not, despite having to fulfil the criteria for such in order to be appointed.’ 

Read Veronica's article 'Policing the police' here.
Issue: 7995 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Regulatory
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll