header-logo header-logo

23 September 2022
Issue: 7995 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Police misconduct policers fear prospect of being sued

Who polices the police and should they be given immunity from suit? Barrister and journalist Veronica Cowan poses this question in NLJ this week.

Those who police the police are Legally Qualified Chairs and Independent Panel Members (LQCs and IPMs), who are appointed by Police and Crime Commissioners, to serve on police misconduct hearing panels. They need to do so without fear or favour yet, as Cowan reports, LQCs and IPMs are withdrawing their services because they fear being sued for acts or omissions of the panel, following a recent case.

Cowan writes: ‘This is challenging, important and responsible work, yet, while those who sit in courts and tribunals have judicial immunity, because they are judicial appointments, LQCs and IPMs do not, despite having to fulfil the criteria for such in order to be appointed.’ 

Read Veronica's article 'Policing the police' here.
Issue: 7995 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Regulatory
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll