header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Pothole in the grass! Planning fee hike! CPR Pt23!

15 December 2023
Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
Inflation! Everything’s going up including planning fees in England, with a 35% increase for major applications, NLJ columnist and former District Judge Stephen Gold writes in this week’s Civil way

Gold covers disclosure of electronic documents in family proceedings as well as the missing letter that tarnished the Royal Mail’s reputation among judges and court staff.

Mountain bikes and unexpected potholes don’t mix, apparently, resulting in a complex vertebra fracture for an unfortunate rider who had to give up his job as a result, but was the council to blame? What made this case unusual is that the pothole was on the grass verge next to the road.

Also in Civil way caselaw this week, Gold looks at Riniker v Al-Turk, a case with a ‘tangled background’ which ‘produces some material which could get you off the hook with an imperfect CPR Pt 23 application’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll