header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Problem-solving on disclosure in international fraud

12 July 2024
Issue: 8079 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Fraud , International
printer mail-detail
181424

Jurisdictional obstacles can be tricky to overcome, but the English courts are taking a pragmatic approach when it comes to third-party disclosure in international fraud cases, Christian Tuddenham and Tracey Lattimer write in this week’s NLJ

Tuddenham, partner, and Lattimer, senior associate, Jenner & Block, look in particular at the recent case of Tonstate Group Ltd (in liquidation) & Ors v Edward Wojakovski & Ors [2024] EWHC 1196 (Ch), [2024] All ER (D) 87 (May), in which the claimants sought to recover £13.5m company funds illegitimately extracted. To this end, they needed to establish jurisdiction in order to force disclosure of relevant documents, as the producer of the documents resided abroad.

The authors explain how this was achieved. They write: ‘The decision illustrates the willingness of the English courts to adopt a pragmatic approach to potential jurisdictional obstacles where justice requires.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll