header-logo header-logo

22 March 2024
Issue: 8064 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law , Public
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Redacted names & blank spaces—what happened to the duty of candour?

164873

The growing practice of censoring government documents—or redaction—is the subject of Nicholas Dobson’s article in this week’s NLJ

He covers the February Court of Appeal case, R (IAB & Others), in which the court considered the redaction of all junior civil servants’ names from evidence.

Dobson writes: ‘Bean LJ remarked the appellants’ submissions seemed “extraordinarily far-reaching” as “junior civil servants comprise some 98% of the civil service as a whole”. This is likely to result in disclosed documents covered in black spaces.’

Giving judgment, Bean LJ stated: ‘The practice is inimical to open government and unsupported by authority.’

Dobson looks at a range of case law and judicial comment on the issue, and questions whether the routine redaction of documents can be justified.

Issue: 8064 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law , Public
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters Private Equity expertise with the appointment of James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons strengthens Rural Affairs team with senior appointment

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley adds insurance mergers and acquisitions partner to London office

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll