header-logo header-logo

22 March 2024
Issue: 8064 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law , Public
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Redacted names & blank spaces—what happened to the duty of candour?

164873

The growing practice of censoring government documents—or redaction—is the subject of Nicholas Dobson’s article in this week’s NLJ

He covers the February Court of Appeal case, R (IAB & Others), in which the court considered the redaction of all junior civil servants’ names from evidence.

Dobson writes: ‘Bean LJ remarked the appellants’ submissions seemed “extraordinarily far-reaching” as “junior civil servants comprise some 98% of the civil service as a whole”. This is likely to result in disclosed documents covered in black spaces.’

Giving judgment, Bean LJ stated: ‘The practice is inimical to open government and unsupported by authority.’

Dobson looks at a range of case law and judicial comment on the issue, and questions whether the routine redaction of documents can be justified.

Issue: 8064 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law , Public
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll