header-logo header-logo

21 June 2024
Issue: 8076 / Categories: Legal News , Environment , Climate change litigation , EU , Human rights
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Reshaping climate justice

177928

The KlimaSeniorinnen case is a landmark judgment in terms of climate litigation by the European Court of Human Rights

In this week’s NLJ, David Lawne, partner, Luke Grimes, senior associate, and Ginevra Bicciolo, associate, Hausfeld, write that the case ‘firmly establishes the principle that inaction by states on climate change may constitute a breach of human rights’.

Lawne, Grimes and Bicciolo take an in-depth look at the case and why it succeeded. They assess its implications for future litigation, both in the UK and in Convention contracting states abroad.

The authors note it sets a high bar for individual applicants and a low bar for associations seeking to bring climate change cases. They write: ‘In doing so it recognised that associations play a crucial role in representing those most affected by climate change, such as future generations who cannot speak for themselves.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll