header-logo header-logo

21 April 2023
Issue: 8021 / Categories: Legal News , Sanctions , Criminal , International justice
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Staying the course on sanctions

119351
One year and counting since the invasion of Ukraine, cracks are appearing in the sanctions regime, Ben Keith, Rhys Davies & Olivia Chessell at International Human Rights Advisors report in this week’s NLJ.

They note that Magnitsky sanctions have been imposed on Bulgarian oligarchs as well as those with connections to President Vladimir Putin. However, a recent case may encourage designated individuals to bring legal challenges. Moreover, states tend to put their own economic interests first. Consequently, the punitive measures imposed on Putin’s funders and friends are proving ineffective.

Keith, Davies and Chessell write: ‘It is imperative that the UK, EU, US and other states maintain a robust, coherent and joined-up approach to sanctions… A piecemeal approach to sanctions, with erosion here and there, risks undermining the entire edifice.’ 

Read their full piece on sanctions here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll