header-logo header-logo

12 July 2024
Issue: 8079 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Successive contracts, fairness for one & TUPE—simples!

181429

Time-travelling (for purposes of calculating the national minimum wage), successive fixed-terms contracts, a ‘pool of one’ redundancy and ‘economic activity’ are all covered in this week’s NLJ employment brief

Ian Smith, professor of employment law at Norwich Law School, UEA, looks at four recent Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) cases. First, under what justification can an employer keep someone, a locum consultant, on successive fixed-term contracts for four years without them becoming an employee? Smith notes ‘there has been little case law on this for several years’, so the decision is of interest as a factual example.

Other cases considered whether employees should be paid for time spent on a poultry farm bus to their sheds, redundancy unfairness and what qualifies as ‘economic activity’ under TUPE.

Issue: 8079 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll