header-logo header-logo

24 November 2023
Issue: 8050 / Categories: Legal News , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Too much, too little, or are the arbitration reform proposals just right?

147356
The Arbitration Act is 25 years old and in line for reform courtesy of proposals put forward by the Law Commission, but are they needed? Is anything missing? Do they go too far? 

In this week’s NLJ, Chris Ward, knowledge lawyer, and Clare Arthurs, partner, Penningtons Manches Cooper, assess the proposals for reform in turn and deliver their verdict on each.

Ward and Arthurs cover the doctrine of separability, arbitrator disclosure, summary disposal, exercise of court powers against third parties, and more. On jurisdiction challenges, they write that the draft bill proposes that, in the absence of an express choice, the law applicable to the arbitration agreement will be the law of the seat. As a pro-arbitration venue ascribing to the principle of separability, the UK would be, more than ever, a one-stop shop for commercial adjudication.’

Throughout their assessment, they keep in mind the maxim, ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll