header-logo header-logo

24 November 2023
Issue: 8050 / Categories: Legal News , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Too much, too little, or are the arbitration reform proposals just right?

147356
The Arbitration Act is 25 years old and in line for reform courtesy of proposals put forward by the Law Commission, but are they needed? Is anything missing? Do they go too far? 

In this week’s NLJ, Chris Ward, knowledge lawyer, and Clare Arthurs, partner, Penningtons Manches Cooper, assess the proposals for reform in turn and deliver their verdict on each.

Ward and Arthurs cover the doctrine of separability, arbitrator disclosure, summary disposal, exercise of court powers against third parties, and more. On jurisdiction challenges, they write that the draft bill proposes that, in the absence of an express choice, the law applicable to the arbitration agreement will be the law of the seat. As a pro-arbitration venue ascribing to the principle of separability, the UK would be, more than ever, a one-stop shop for commercial adjudication.’

Throughout their assessment, they keep in mind the maxim, ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters Private Equity expertise with the appointment of James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons strengthens Rural Affairs team with senior appointment

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley adds insurance mergers and acquisitions partner to London office

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll