header-logo header-logo

02 December 2022
Issue: 8005 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , EU
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Who is driving the assault on our human rights?

102826
‘Depicting the ECHR and HRA 1998 as alien intrusions undermining British sovereignty is historically illiterate,’ Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC writes in this week’s NLJ. Bindman asks: ‘What is behind this assault on the judiciary, the ECHR and HRA 1998?’

He highlights the influence of thinktanks on a government that is displaying undemocratic and authoritarian tendencies. Current justice Secretary Dominic Raab’s antipathy to the Human Rights Act and European Convention on Human Rights is well-documented, and the influence of the thinktank Policy Exchange can be traced in his speeches.

Bindman reminds us that the ECHR came out of a largely British initiative spearheaded by Winston Churchill and embodies principles arising in Britain such as the magna carta.

Read Sir Geoffrey's article in full here
Issue: 8005 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll