header-logo header-logo

NLJ's costs revision course

22 September 2017 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 6672 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail
nlj_7762_regan

In his first post-holiday refresher article, Dominic Regan addresses the challenges of costs management

  • Incurred costs represent the single greatest problem.
  • The Harrison hurricane.
  • Jackson’s legacy

Costs management (CM) plays an integral part in multi-track litigation. The Jackson Report of 31July 2017 backed away from a colossal extension of fixed costs. Consequently, budgeting will continue to be a regular occurrence.

It was the fervent hope of litigators that the Court of Appeal judgment in Harrison v University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust [2017] EWCA Civ 792, building upon the guidance from Merrix v Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust [2017] EWHC 346 (QB) would clarify costs management once and for all. If only. As others have eloquently explained in this journal, the Appeal Court shied away from explaining what it thought would amount to ‘good reason’ for departing from a budget.

A grenade lobbed in at the conclusion of Harrison was the declaration that proportionality could be addressed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll