header-logo header-logo

17 March 2022
Issue: 7971 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

No case for HRA reform

Lawyers have confirmed their opposition to Ministry of Justice (MoJ) proposals to reform the Human Rights Act 1998

The MoJ consultation, ’Human Rights Act reform: a modern Bill of Rights’, closed last week apart from an extension for respondents with a visual impairment. Responding, the Law Society said there was no case for the reforms, and expressed concern the proposals would damage the rule of law, prevent access to justice, remove or reduce rights, lead to more cases being taken to the European Court of Human Rights, impact devolution, damage the UK's international reputation, reduce legal certainty and increase costs and complexity.

In its response, the Society of Labour Lawyers (SLL) said creating a permission hurdle for bringing human rights claims in the UK courts would have a ‘chilling effect’, deterring potential claimants.

Catherine Atkinson, chair of SLL, said: ‘Some of the proposals in the government’s consultation on the Human Rights Act are thinly veiled attempts to avoid being held to account.’

Read the consultation here.

Issue: 7971 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll