header-logo header-logo

24 July 2019
Issue: 7850 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

No changes to solicitors’ fees

Individual practising fees will remain at £278 next year, the Board of the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has decided. 
The proposed fee levels will now be submitted to the Legal Services Board for approval, with a final decision expected mid-August. Firm practising fees are calculated on a case-by-case basis. Next year’s total funding requirement is £102.5m, of which the SRA share is £54.1m, up from £52.6m. Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘While our funding requirement has increased slightly this year because of additional work such as tackling money laundering, we have been able to minimise the increase.’
Issue: 7850 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll