header-logo header-logo

No deal scenario looms

31 July 2019
Issue: 7851 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail
GDPR, immigration & enforcement among issues facing profession post-Brexit

Law firms are bracing themselves for no deal after the government pledged a Halloween Brexit come what may.

The prime minister stepped up his bullish rhetoric this week, refusing to meet with EU leaders unless they scrap the Irish backstop, while Cabinet minister Michael Gove said the government was assuming no deal would be the most likely outcome. 

David Greene, senior partner at Edwin Coe and NLJ consultant editor, said: ‘Leaving the EU without a deal seems, according to the new administration, to be a looming reality despite the legions advocating against it. 

‘The Law Society like many other bodies representing professional services has campaigned against a “no deal” but then so has the Confederation of British Industry, the Institute of Directors, the City and very many others.

‘Many of the larger firms have prepared for no deal but for smaller firms it is more difficult. Some of the issues that need to be addressed are, for instance, transfer of data under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) after departure, enforcement of judgments, immigration issues for staff and for clients and the effect on child arrangements in divorce, and practice rights in the EU, particularly on a “fly in fly out” basis. 

‘In a transition period we would have the “luxury” of working on these over time, but no deal means no time. The profession will deal with it and will be there for clients, but like all things, preparation is the key to success, and this preparation cannot wait.’

More than 2,700 solicitors have registered in Ireland so they can keep their EU practising rights post-Brexit, and some of the larger firms have opened offices there. However, it is not yet clear that those lawyers will be able to practise from outside of Ireland, and the Law Societies of England and Wales and of Ireland are currently in discussion about this point.

Last week, Law Society president Simon Davis warned the prime minister: ‘Preserving the legal sector’s strong economic contribution will require continued close co-operation with the EU and depend on the continued ability of UK lawyers to practise there.’

Issue: 7851 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll