header-logo header-logo

31 July 2019
Issue: 7851 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail

No deal scenario looms

GDPR, immigration & enforcement among issues facing profession post-Brexit

Law firms are bracing themselves for no deal after the government pledged a Halloween Brexit come what may.

The prime minister stepped up his bullish rhetoric this week, refusing to meet with EU leaders unless they scrap the Irish backstop, while Cabinet minister Michael Gove said the government was assuming no deal would be the most likely outcome. 

David Greene, senior partner at Edwin Coe and NLJ consultant editor, said: ‘Leaving the EU without a deal seems, according to the new administration, to be a looming reality despite the legions advocating against it. 

‘The Law Society like many other bodies representing professional services has campaigned against a “no deal” but then so has the Confederation of British Industry, the Institute of Directors, the City and very many others.

‘Many of the larger firms have prepared for no deal but for smaller firms it is more difficult. Some of the issues that need to be addressed are, for instance, transfer of data under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) after departure, enforcement of judgments, immigration issues for staff and for clients and the effect on child arrangements in divorce, and practice rights in the EU, particularly on a “fly in fly out” basis. 

‘In a transition period we would have the “luxury” of working on these over time, but no deal means no time. The profession will deal with it and will be there for clients, but like all things, preparation is the key to success, and this preparation cannot wait.’

More than 2,700 solicitors have registered in Ireland so they can keep their EU practising rights post-Brexit, and some of the larger firms have opened offices there. However, it is not yet clear that those lawyers will be able to practise from outside of Ireland, and the Law Societies of England and Wales and of Ireland are currently in discussion about this point.

Last week, Law Society president Simon Davis warned the prime minister: ‘Preserving the legal sector’s strong economic contribution will require continued close co-operation with the EU and depend on the continued ability of UK lawyers to practise there.’

Issue: 7851 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll