header-logo header-logo

31 July 2019
Issue: 7851 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail

No deal scenario looms

GDPR, immigration & enforcement among issues facing profession post-Brexit

Law firms are bracing themselves for no deal after the government pledged a Halloween Brexit come what may.

The prime minister stepped up his bullish rhetoric this week, refusing to meet with EU leaders unless they scrap the Irish backstop, while Cabinet minister Michael Gove said the government was assuming no deal would be the most likely outcome. 

David Greene, senior partner at Edwin Coe and NLJ consultant editor, said: ‘Leaving the EU without a deal seems, according to the new administration, to be a looming reality despite the legions advocating against it. 

‘The Law Society like many other bodies representing professional services has campaigned against a “no deal” but then so has the Confederation of British Industry, the Institute of Directors, the City and very many others.

‘Many of the larger firms have prepared for no deal but for smaller firms it is more difficult. Some of the issues that need to be addressed are, for instance, transfer of data under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) after departure, enforcement of judgments, immigration issues for staff and for clients and the effect on child arrangements in divorce, and practice rights in the EU, particularly on a “fly in fly out” basis. 

‘In a transition period we would have the “luxury” of working on these over time, but no deal means no time. The profession will deal with it and will be there for clients, but like all things, preparation is the key to success, and this preparation cannot wait.’

More than 2,700 solicitors have registered in Ireland so they can keep their EU practising rights post-Brexit, and some of the larger firms have opened offices there. However, it is not yet clear that those lawyers will be able to practise from outside of Ireland, and the Law Societies of England and Wales and of Ireland are currently in discussion about this point.

Last week, Law Society president Simon Davis warned the prime minister: ‘Preserving the legal sector’s strong economic contribution will require continued close co-operation with the EU and depend on the continued ability of UK lawyers to practise there.’

Issue: 7851 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll