header-logo header-logo

21 June 2012 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7519 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

No entry

Geoffrey Bindman QC recalls UK immigration in the 1960s

 

A report in The Guardian on 31 March 2012 headed “Anger over plan to x-ray young asylum seekers to check age” brought back memories of immigration and citizenship law in the 1960s. Until the case which I describe later, x-rays of young would-be immigrants from the Indian sub-continent were routinely performed. A practice condemned then should not be revived.
Restricted entry
Entry from the Commonwealth was first restricted by the Commonwealth Immigrants Act 1962 (CIA 1962). No formal legal mechanism for challenging refusals of entry at airports existed. I got used to being summoned day and night to Heathrow by distraught family members whose loved ones were about to be returned to the sub-continent or East Africa. Children under 16 of those already settled in the UK were entitled to be admitted. CIA 1962 required the young person to satisfy the immigration officer that he or she was eligible. The absence of birth registration in parts of the sub-continent made this difficult.
The decision
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll