header-logo header-logo

12 January 2012
Issue: 7496 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

No family law funds

Family law clients to be hit heavily by legal aid cuts

The proposed cuts to family law legal aid would remove public funding from more than 75% of family law clients, a survey by family lawyers’ association Resolution has shown.

The survey, completed by 267 family lawyers who do legal aid work, suggested the loss of funding would affect parents who risked losing contact with their children, increase the numbers left to survive on benefits, and put extra pressure on the courts.

Some 57% of respondents said at least half their cases involved a parent who risked losing contact with their children—affecting more than 4,000 children.

David Allison, chairman of Resolution, says the proposed cuts could have “devastating consequences”.

“The changes also risk increasing the nation’s benefits bill,” he says. “Many of our members say that the majority of their clients would not know what financial settlement they are entitled to, which could see them left dependent on the welfare state and benefits.”

Some 42% of respondents said appropriate legal advice meant that at least half their cases settled without going to court. All respondents agreed that cases take longer when one party is representing themselves.

Over 40% of current legal aid cases have been assessed as unsuitable for mediation.
 

Issue: 7496 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll