header-logo header-logo

No family law funds

12 January 2012
Issue: 7496 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Family law clients to be hit heavily by legal aid cuts

The proposed cuts to family law legal aid would remove public funding from more than 75% of family law clients, a survey by family lawyers’ association Resolution has shown.

The survey, completed by 267 family lawyers who do legal aid work, suggested the loss of funding would affect parents who risked losing contact with their children, increase the numbers left to survive on benefits, and put extra pressure on the courts.

Some 57% of respondents said at least half their cases involved a parent who risked losing contact with their children—affecting more than 4,000 children.

David Allison, chairman of Resolution, says the proposed cuts could have “devastating consequences”.

“The changes also risk increasing the nation’s benefits bill,” he says. “Many of our members say that the majority of their clients would not know what financial settlement they are entitled to, which could see them left dependent on the welfare state and benefits.”

Some 42% of respondents said appropriate legal advice meant that at least half their cases settled without going to court. All respondents agreed that cases take longer when one party is representing themselves.

Over 40% of current legal aid cases have been assessed as unsuitable for mediation.
 

Issue: 7496 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll